When running an Apex test on a user story, what may you include?

When running an Apex test on a user story, what may you include?

• A. Only committed test classes
• B. Additional test classes not committed
• C. References to immediately defined classes
• D. Archived test classes

Answer: (B)

When running an Apex test on a user story, including additional test classes that are not committed allows for greater flexibility and completeness in your testing process. This approach enables you to utilize all available resources that might be relevant to the user story, ensuring that you can effectively test various scenarios and configurations beyond the committed classes. In practice, while you may have committed test classes as part of a deployment, there may be additional test classes that exist locally or in a development branch that provide better coverage or validate more complex interactions. By including these additional test classes, you can comprehensively assess the functionality of the code associated with the user story, potentially identifying issues that might not be covered by the committed tests alone. Others options such as only including committed test classes restrict the testing process to a limited subset of available tests, leading to potentially incomplete validation. References to immediately defined classes could limit tests to only newly created code without leveraging the full testing suite that includes both committed and non-committed classes. Archived test classes become irrelevant as they are not accessible during the active testing process, as they are no longer in use or available for the current context.

When running an Apex test on a user story, including additional test classes that are not committed allows for greater flexibility and completeness in your testing process. This approach enables you to utilize all available resources that might be relevant to the user story, ensuring that you can effectively test various scenarios and configurations beyond the committed classes.

In practice, while you may have committed test classes as part of a deployment, there may be additional test classes that exist locally or in a development branch that provide better coverage or validate more complex interactions. By including these additional test classes, you can comprehensively assess the functionality of the code associated with the user story, potentially identifying issues that might not be covered by the committed tests alone.

Others options such as only including committed test classes restrict the testing process to a limited subset of available tests, leading to potentially incomplete validation. References to immediately defined classes could limit tests to only newly created code without leveraging the full testing suite that includes both committed and non-committed classes. Archived test classes become irrelevant as they are not accessible during the active testing process, as they are no longer in use or available for the current context.